This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lund, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lund, C. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: Did Meta-Analysis Clarify the Role and Relevance of Denial?

615 Second Avenue, 290, Seattle, WA 98104, clund{at}ix.netcom.com.

Seven studies selected for meta-analysis of the denial variable in a large-scale meta-analysis of predictors of sexual recidivism are briefly reviewed and a number of methodologic issues are identified that relate to interpretation of the failure of meta-analysis to find an effect for the denial variable. These include variability in definition of the denial variable, variation in treatment access and exclusion for deniers, low base rates of recidivism, small sample sizes, low power, and high probability of type II error across individual studies. Despite the apparent objectivity and power of this methodology, a careful examination of the individual studies suggests that meta-analysis did not clarify the role and relevance of denial as a predictor of sexual recidivism. Further work is necessary to clarify the role and relevance of denial in treatment success, risk assessment, and risk prediction.

Key Words: meta-analysis • denial • sexual recidivism • base rate • power.

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 12, No. 4, 275-287 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/107906320001200404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?