This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gannon, T. A. Articles by Rose, M. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gannon, T. A. Articles by Rose, M. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Offense-Related Interpretative Bias in Female Child Molesters

A Preliminary Study

University of Kent, UK, t.a.gannon{at}kent.ac.uk

Mariamne R. Rose

University of Kent, UK

Although female child molesters are hypothesized to hold offense-supportive cognitions that facilitate their sexual offenses, there have been no implicit social-cognitive studies used to investigate this. Using an implicit memory recognition paradigm, it is shown that female child molesters—relative to female offender controls—are more likely to interpret ambiguous information about males in a threatening manner. These results suggest that female child molesters hold a series of beliefs about men's dangerousness and power. The authors discuss these results and explore the possibility that these beliefs about male dangerousness are related to a risk of abusing children.

Key Words: female child molesters • implicit schemas • offense-supportive cognition • treatment

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 21, No. 2, 194-207 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1079063209332236


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?