Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1079063209338491v1
21/3/335    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clift, R. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gretton, H. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clift, R. J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gretton, H. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Discriminative and Predictive Validity of the Penile Plethysmograph in Adolescent Sex Offenders

Robert J. W. Clift

Youth Forensic Psychiatric Services, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, Robert.Clift{at}gov.bc.ca

Gordana Rajlic

Youth Forensic Psychiatric Services, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Heather M. Gretton

Youth Forensic Psychiatric Services, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

The current study addresses the discriminative and predictive validity of the penile plethysmograph (PPG) in a sample of 132 male adolescent sex offenders who were admitted to a sex offender treatment program. The subjects were assessed pretreatment and posttreatment, under two different instructions sets: an Arouse condition, where subjects allowed themselves to become aroused; and a Suppress condition, where subjects attempted to suppress or control their arousal. Under the pretreatment Arouse condition, the group with male child victims demonstrated significantly greater arousal to child stimuli than the group with female nonchild victims. However, the group with female child victims could not be differentiated from the group with female nonchild victims. Under the Suppress condition, there was no evidence of discriminative validity for any of the PPG indices. As for predictive validity, posttreatment arousal to male and female children was significantly related to sexual offense recidivism. Posttreatment inability to suppress deviant arousal to male and female children was also significantly related to sexual offense recidivism over the 6-year follow-up period. In light of these findings, the implications for adolescent sex offender research and treatment are discussed.

Key Words: adolescents • discriminative validity • penile plethysmograph • phallometric assessment • predictive validity • sex offenders

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 21, No. 3, 335-362 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1079063209338491


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?